МЕНЮ


Фестивали и конкурсы
Семинары
Издания
О МОДНТ
Приглашения
Поздравляем

НАУЧНЫЕ РАБОТЫ


  • Инновационный менеджмент
  • Инвестиции
  • ИГП
  • Земельное право
  • Журналистика
  • Жилищное право
  • Радиоэлектроника
  • Психология
  • Программирование и комп-ры
  • Предпринимательство
  • Право
  • Политология
  • Полиграфия
  • Педагогика
  • Оккультизм и уфология
  • Начертательная геометрия
  • Бухучет управленчучет
  • Биология
  • Бизнес-план
  • Безопасность жизнедеятельности
  • Банковское дело
  • АХД экпред финансы предприятий
  • Аудит
  • Ветеринария
  • Валютные отношения
  • Бухгалтерский учет и аудит
  • Ботаника и сельское хозяйство
  • Биржевое дело
  • Банковское дело
  • Астрономия
  • Архитектура
  • Арбитражный процесс
  • Безопасность жизнедеятельности
  • Административное право
  • Авиация и космонавтика
  • Кулинария
  • Наука и техника
  • Криминология
  • Криминалистика
  • Косметология
  • Коммуникации и связь
  • Кибернетика
  • Исторические личности
  • Информатика
  • Инвестиции
  • по Зоология
  • Журналистика
  • Карта сайта
  • How to negotiate effectively

    How to negotiate effectively

    HOW TO NEGOTIATE EFFECTIVELY

    1. What is negotiation

    Negotiation is an essential part of the every-day business life. It can

    take place at any time and in any place. Negotiation is a kind of meeting,

    but contrary to the latter it may be held in some unexpected and

    uncomfortable place such as the street or on the stairs.

    There are several definitions of negotiation. It is said to be “the process

    for resolving conflict between two or more parties whereby both or all

    modify their demands to achieve a mutually acceptable compromise”. Thus, it

    is “the process of changing both parties’ views of their ideal outcome into

    an attainable outcome”.

    The need of negotiation arises when we are not fully in control of events.

    Negotiations take place to handle mutual differences or conflict of:

    . interests (wages, hours, work conditions, prices: seller vs buyer)

    . rights (different interpretations of an agreement)

    The aim of a negotiation is to come to an agreement which is acceptable to

    both sides, and to preserve the overall relationships. While specific

    issues are to be negotiated, common interest are yet still to be

    maintained. Negotiations do not mean “war”. Negotiators can still be

    friends and partners.

    2. The negotiation continuum

    . Overlap

    The situations of negotiation can be shown diagrammatically in terms of

    ideals and limits.

    Ideal

    Limit

    HIM

    Bargaining area

    Limit Ideal YOU

    The limit may be the limit of negotiator’s authority, such as a minimum

    (e.g. price) acceptable. If there is overlap it is possible to settle. The

    final position within the bargaining area, where settlement takes place,

    depends on the negotiators’ relative strength and skill.

    . No overlap

    The aim of the negotiator is to achieve a result, i.e. to find a solution,

    within the bargaining area. However, it is possible that both parties set

    limits which do not provide overlap. In this case the negotiators have to

    move their limits, otherwise the negotiation will be broken down.

    Ideal Limit

    HIM

    No deal

    YOU

    Limit Ideal

    . Too much overlap

    The opposite case is also possible. When one is careless and settles for

    less than he could. In this case the limit of the opposite side should be

    found and the ideal should be revised.

    Ideal

    Limit

    HIM

    YOU

    Limit Ideal

    Revised Ideal

    3. The approach

    There are four main stages of negotiation:

    . Preparing objectives, information, strategy

    . Discussing (argue) and signalling willingness to move

    . Propose and bargain

    . Close and agree

    While preparing to the negotiation it is important not only to prepare

    supporting arguments but also to define objectives. Objectives should be

    realistic and attainable and have certain priorities. It is also necessary

    to investigate the opponent’s plans and priorities, which can be rather

    difficult.

    The objectives should be classified basically as follows:

    Like Ideal but least important

    Intend Achievable, a range of possibilities

    Must The real limit

    Ideal

    Limit

    AREA OF NO DEAL

    Like

    Intend

    Must

    The general strategy for negotiation is to have a negotiating team of three

    people, who will also be involved in the preparation.

    . Leader The person who will do the talking and conduct the

    negotiations

    . Summariser The person who will ask questions and summarise for

    control

    . Observer The person not involved in the actual negotiations, whose

    role is

    to watch, listen and record

    80 % of the negotiating time is spent arguing. If it equals 100 % the

    negotiation will break down. There are two kinds of arguing:

    . Reasonable and constructive Debates, discussions

    . Unreasonable and destructive Emotional quarrels

    The opponent may try to divert you by escaping into destructive behaviour.

    In this case, your behaviour should be not to interrupt, but to listen and

    control your feelings. Even if the battle is won, the war can be lost.

    A negotiator should be constructive in arguments and try to get information

    by asking open questions or even leading questions. One thing should be

    tackled at a time and the opponent should be made justify his case item by

    item.

    It is important to be non-committal and to state only ideals at first.

    Later, the information about the negotiator’s position can be given, and

    later alternative proposals can be made. Sometimes it is necessary to

    challenge the opponent, so that he demonstrates his strengths.

    Negotiation means movement. It may be that both parties move on one issue.

    It may be that each moves on different issue. The motive forces are

    twofold:

    . Sanctions The penalty of not agreeing

    . Incentives The benefits of agreeing.

    In both cases, the parties seek to protect their self-interests. They will

    show willingness to move by sending signals.

    To signal is not to show weakness. But if both parties wait for the other

    to signal, the result will be deadlock.

    The opponent’s signals will show his willingness to move. So one should

    listen, recognise his signals and interpret them, looking for the qualified

    words which are evidence of willingness to move.

    Another very important point of negotiations is proposing and bargaining.

    Proposals should be realistic in order not to cause argument and deadlock.

    The language of the proposal signals one’s firmness. Weak language such as

    “we hope…, we like…, we prefer…” should be avoided. Instead, a phrase “we

    propose…” is appropriate.

    The final step in a negotiation is closing and agreeing. There are two

    aspects to it:

    . When to close

    . How to close

    The first is the most difficult moment to recognise. There is a balance

    between:

    . Closing too early More concessions from the opponent could have

    been

    squeezed

    . Closing too late The opponents squeezed excessive concessions.

    The aim of closing is to get the opposition to stop bargaining and to make

    an agreement. The final thing to do is to write down the agreement and

    agree what is written down. It is necessary to do this before leaving the

    negotiating table.

    4. Characteristics of an effective negotiator

    What characteristics should one have to be an effective negotiator. The

    first and the most important characteristics, from the standpoint of many

    executives and managers of large corporations, is preparation and planning

    skills.

    The other very important characteristics are:

    Knowledge of subject matter being negotiated

    Ability to think clearly and rapidly under pressure and uncertainty

    Ability to express thoughts verbally

    Listening skills

    . Judgement and general intelligence

    . Integrity

    . Ability to persuade others

    . Patience

    . Decisiveness

    5. Conclusion

    In spite of the existence of negotiating theories, it is frequently

    difficult to apply theoretical and conceptual knowledge in a practical

    situation. In order to be a good negotiator, one should have negotiation

    skills as well as a theoretical knowledge. But without a practical

    experience it is hard to negotiate effectively.

    Interpersonal skills are very important in the negotiation, but what can

    help a negotiating party while thinking what to do is not an elaborated

    theory, but rather is it a simple analysis and intuition.

    Bibliography

    1. Raiffa, Howard. 1982. The art and science of negotiation. Harvard

    University Press. Pages 119-133.

    Murcott, Owen. 1991. IBS Management Training. Hanzehogeschool. Groningen.


    Приглашения

    09.12.2013 - 16.12.2013

    Международный конкурс хореографического искусства в рамках Международного фестиваля искусств «РОЖДЕСТВЕНСКАЯ АНДОРРА»

    09.12.2013 - 16.12.2013

    Международный конкурс хорового искусства в АНДОРРЕ «РОЖДЕСТВЕНСКАЯ АНДОРРА»




    Copyright © 2012 г.
    При использовании материалов - ссылка на сайт обязательна.